BlueROCKER® Trial Brace

This product is permanently labelled "Trial Brace". It is only to be used for patient assessment, to determine ToeOFF Family product and/or size to achieve optimum gait for the patient. We recommend the first assessment to be done in parallel bars. Includes SoftKIT - Applied!

Item No. Model Size L/R Shoe Size Footplate Length Height
289411010 BlueROCKER 2.0 Trial Brace Simple Straps X-Small Left 32-35 21 cm 36 cm
289411011 BlueROCKER 2.0 Trial Brace Simple Straps Small Left 35-38 23 cm 38 cm
289411012 BlueROCKER 2.0 Trial Brace Simple Straps Medium Left 38-42 24,5 cm 40,5 cm
289411013 BlueROCKER 2.0 Trial Brace Simple Straps Large Left 42-45 27 cm 43 cm
289411014 BlueROCKER 2.0 Trial Brace Simple Straps X-Large Left >45 28,5 cm 45 cm
289412010 BlueROCKER 2.0 Trial Brace Simple Straps X-Small Right 32-35 21 cm 36 cm
289412011 BlueROCKER 2.0 Trial Brace Simple Straps Small Right 35-38 23 cm 38 cm
289412012 BlueROCKER 2.0 Trial Brace Simple Straps Medium Right 38-42 24,5 cm 40,5 cm
289412013 BlueROCKER 2.0 Trial Brace Simple Straps Large Right 42-45 27 cm 43 cm
289412014 BlueROCKER 2.0 Trial Brace Simple Straps X-Large Right >45 28,5 cm 45 cm
289431010 BlueROCKER 2.0 Trial Brace D-ring Straps X-Small Left 32-35 21 cm 36 cm
289431011 BlueROCKER 2.0 Trial Brace D-ring Straps Small Left 35-38 23 cm 38 cm
289431012 BlueROCKER 2.0 Trial Brace D-ring Straps Medium Left 38-42 24,5 cm 40,5 cm
289431013 BlueROCKER 2.0 Trial Brace D-ring Straps Large Left 42-45 27 cm 43 cm
289431014 BlueROCKER 2.0 Trial Brace D-ring Straps X-Large Left >45 28,5 cm 45 cm
289432010 BlueROCKER 2.0 Trial Brace D-ring Straps X-Small Right 32-35 21 cm 36 cm
289432011 BlueROCKER 2.0 Trial Brace D-ring Straps Small Right 35-38 23 cm 38 cm
289432012 BlueROCKER 2.0 Trial Brace D-ring Straps Medium Right 38-42 24,5 cm 40,5 cm
289432013 BlueROCKER 2.0 Trial Brace D-ring Straps Large Right 42-45 27 cm 43 cm
289432014 BlueROCKER 2.0 Trial Brace D-ring Straps X-Large Right >45 28,5 cm 45 cm
Energy expenditure in stroke subjects walking with a carbon composite ankle foot orthosis

Author: Danielsson A, Stibrant Sunnerhagen K.

Source: J Rehabil Med 2004; 36: 165–168

One clinic's experience with carbon fiber orthoses in neuromuscular disease

Author: ANI MNATSAKANIAN BS et al.

Source: Muscle Nerve 000:000–000, 2016

Efficacy of prefabricated carbon-composite ankle foot orthoses for children with unilateral spastic cerebral palsy exhibiting a drop foot pattern.
Characterization of Defects in Polymaer Composites Used in Medical Devices by Means of X-ray Microtomography.

Author: Roberts Joffe, Fredrik Forsberg, Henrik Lycksam, Anders Sjögren

Source: ICTMS 2017 - 3rd International Conference on Tomography of Materials and Structures, 26-30 June 2017, Lund, Sweden

Multiplanar Stiffness of Commercial Carbon Composite Ankle-Foot Orthoses.
Comparison of five different methodologies for evaluating ankle–foot orthosis stiffness.
Carbon fiber ankle-foot orthoses in impaired population

Author: Megan M. Grunst, Robert C. Wiederien and Jason M.

Source: A systematic review Prosthetics and Orthotics International 2023

A Pilot Study to Assess the Immediate Effect of Dynamic Carbon Ground Reaction Ankle Foot Orthoses on Balance in Individuals with Charcot-Marie-Tooth in a Clinical Setting

Author: Burke K1,2, Cornell K1,3, Swartz Ellrodt A1,2, Grant N1,2, Paganoni S2,4,5 and Sadjadi R1,2*

Source: CMT study.2021

Preliminary research suggests the use of a kinetic return ankle foot orthosis is associated with small but significant shortterm increases in calf circumference, which in turn suggests [...]

Preliminary research suggests the use of a kinetic return ankle foot orthosis is associated with small but significant shortterm increases in calf circumference, which in turn suggests this type of device might reduce or protect against the risk of disuse muscle atrophy.

Author: Robert H. Meier, CO, BOCO; David C. Ruthsatz, CO, CPA; and Daniel, Cipriani, PT, PhD. 

Source: Lermagazine 2014

Related products