/ / / / BlueROCKER® 2.0

BlueROCKER^® 2.0

BlueROCKER^® is designed to manage foot drop in conditions such as Stroke, Multiple Sclerosis, Post Polio Syndrome, Muscular Dystrophy, Spinal Cord Injuries, Traumatic Brain Injuries, Guillian-Barre Syndrome, Charcot-Marie-Tooth, Myelomeningocele, Neuropathy or Cerebral Palsy. BlueROCKER^® 2.0 has a heel height between 12 - 15 mm depending on size.

Recommended Range Of Application

BlueROCKER^® is designed to support gait in conditions such as Posterior Tibialis Tendon Dysfunction (PTTD) and toe amputations. BlueROCKER^® can also be used for partial foot amputations, most proximal level is Chopart.

Contraindications

BlueROCKER^® should not be used when patients present with foot and/or leg ulcers, moderate to severe edema, moderate to severe foot deformities, severe proximal deficits (e.g. quadriceps spasticity, genu valgum or varum, genu recurvatum), severe spasticity.

Other

More about ftting and product selection can be found in the Allard AFO Professional Instruction.

Model

Item No.	Model	Size	L/R	Shoe Size	Footplate Length	Height
289401010	BlueROCKER 2.0	X-Small	Left	32-35	21 cm	36 cm
289401011	BlueROCKER 2.0	Small	Left	35-38	23 cm	38 cm
289401012	BlueROCKER 2.0	Medium	Left	38-42	24,5 cm	40,5 cm
289401013	BlueROCKER 2.0	Large	Left	42-45	27 cm	43 cm
289401014	BlueROCKER 2.0	X-Large	Left	>45	28,5 cm	45 cm
289402010	BlueROCKER 2.0	X-Small	Right	32-35	21 cm	36 cm
289402011	BlueROCKER 2.0	Small	Right	35-38	23 cm	38 cm
289402012	BlueROCKER 2.0	Medium	Right	38-42	24,5 cm	40,5 cm
289402013	BlueROCKER 2.0	Large	Right	42-45	27 cm	43 cm
289402014	BlueROCKER 2.0	X-Large	Right	>45	28,5 cm	45 cm
289421010	BlueROCKER 2.0 with D-ring Straps	X-Small	Left	32-35	21 cm	36 cm
289421011	BlueROCKER 2.0 with D-ring Straps	Small	Left	35-38	23 cm	38 cm
289421012	BlueROCKER 2.0 with D-ring Straps	Medium	Left	38-42	24,5 cm	40,5 cm
289421013	BlueROCKER 2.0 with D-ring Straps	Large	Left	42-45	27 cm	43 cm
289421014	BlueROCKER 2.0 with D-ring Straps	X-Large	Left	>45	28,5 cm	45 cm
289422010	BlueROCKER 2.0 with D-ring Straps	X-Small	Right	32-35	21 cm	36 cm
289422011	BlueROCKER 2.0 with D-ring Straps	Small	Right	35-38	23 cm	38 cm
289422012	BlueROCKER 2.0 with D-ring Straps	Medium	Right	38-42	24,5 cm	40,5 cm
289422013	BlueROCKER 2.0 with D-ring Straps	Large	Right	42-45	27 cm	43 cm
289422014	BlueROCKER 2.0 with D-ring Straps	X-Large	Right	>45	28,5 cm	45 cm

Instructions

Brochures

Brochure AllardAFO (1.13 MB)

Forms

Return form AllardAFO (229.84 KB)

Other documents

Allard AFO STEP 1 PRODUCT SELECTION

Allard AFO STEP 2 SIZE SELECTION

Allard AFO STEP 3 FOOT BIOMECHANICS

Allard AFO STEP 4 SHOE SELECTION & HEEL HEIGHT

Allard AFO STEP 5 PROPER ALIGNMENT

Allard AFO STEP 6 PROXIMAL CONTROL

Allard AFO STEP 7 PATIENT COMFORT

Allard AFO STEP 8 PATIENT EDUCATION

Customizing the ToeOFF® Carbon Fiber AFO to Meet a Runner's Needs

Bracing for a Marathon

Energy expenditure in stroke subjects walking with a carbon composite ankle foot orthosis

Author: Danielsson A, Stibrant Sunnerhagen K.

Source: J Rehabil Med 2004; 36: 165–168

One clinic's experience with carbon fiber orthoses in neuromuscular disease

Author: ANI MNATSAKANIAN BS et al.

Source: Muscle Nerve 000:000–000, 2016

Efficacy of prefabricated carbon-composite ankle foot orthoses for children with unilateral spastic cerebral palsy exhibiting a drop foot pattern.

Author: Altschuck N. et al

Source: Journal of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine: An Interdisciplinary Approach 12 (2019) 171–180 171 DOI 10.3233/PRM-170524

Characterization of Defects in Polymaer Composites Used in Medical Devices by Means of X-ray Microtomography.

Author: Roberts Joffe, Fredrik Forsberg, Henrik Lycksam, Anders Sjögren

Source: ICTMS 2017 - 3^rd International Conference on Tomography of Materials and Structures, 26-30 June 2017, Lund, Sweden

Multiplanar Stiffness of Commercial Carbon Composite Ankle-Foot Orthoses.

Author: Shuman BR, Espesito ER

Source: Journal of Biomechanical Engineering. JANUARY 2022, Vol. 144 / 011004-1

Comparison of five different methodologies for evaluating ankle–foot orthosis stiffness.

Author: Shuman et al.

Source: Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation (2023) 20:11

Carbon fiber ankle-foot orthoses in impaired population

Author: Megan M. Grunst , Robert C. Wiederien1 and Jason M.

Source: A systematic review Prosthetics and Orthotics International 2023

A Pilot Study to Assess the Immediate Effect of Dynamic Carbon Ground Reaction Ankle Foot Orthoses on Balance in Individuals with Charcot-Marie-Tooth in a Clinical Setting

Author: Burke K1,2, Cornell K1,3, Swartz Ellrodt A1,2, Grant N1,2, Paganoni S2,4,5 and Sadjadi R1,2*

Source: CMT study.2021

Preliminary research suggests the use of a kinetic return ankle foot orthosis is associated with small but significant shortterm increases in calf circumference, which in turn suggests [...]

Preliminary research suggests the use of a kinetic return ankle foot orthosis is associated with small but significant shortterm increases in calf circumference, which in turn suggests this type of device might reduce or protect against the risk of disuse muscle atrophy.

Author: Robert H. Meier, CO, BOCO; David C. Ruthsatz, CO, CPA; and Daniel, Cipriani, PT, PhD.

Source: Lermagazine 2014

BlueROCKER® 2.0

Recommended Range Of Application

Contraindications

Other

Model

Size

L/R

Shoe Size

Footplate Length

Height

Related products

BlueROCKER^® 2.0